HIMADA: Litmus test for REDD that is bearing fruit
or Click on the link below
www.ippmedia.com/frontend/index.php?l=40417
Number | % | ||
General understanding of carbon selling | Do not understand | 371 | 67.9 |
Low understanding | 133 | 24.4 | |
Not so sure | 6 | 1.1 | |
Understand | 36 | 2.9 | |
No response | 20 | 3.7 | |
General understanding of REDD initiatives | General REDD issues: | ||
Yes | 56 | 10.3 | |
No | 472 | 86.4 | |
No response | 18 | 3.3 | |
Willingness to participate in REDD initiatives | Yes | 430 | 78.8 |
No | 63 | 11.5 | |
No Response | 53 | 9.7 | |
Factors for participation in REDD | Price mechanism | 349 | 63.9 |
Sustainability of the payment | 395 | 72.3 | |
Waiting period before payment start | 61 | 11.2 | |
What happens after payment period | 24 | 4.4 | |
Permission to harvest after the period | 44 | 8.1 | |
Quantification of the carbon content | 17 | 3.1 | |
Government protection | 33 | 6.0 | |
Others | 16 | 2.9 | |
Measures that can help your area to achieve REDD implementation | Facilitate villages to establish nurseries, tending and planting trees | 172 | 31.5 |
Better protection of existing forests | 315 | 57.7 | |
Use and promotion of efficient alternative energy source | 205 | 37.5 | |
Community involvement in forest management | 309 | 56.6 | |
Efficient nitrogen fertilizers and agronomics practices | 33 | 6.0 | |
Encouraging growing crops that are resistant to adverse weather condition | 41 | 7.5 | |
Promotion of sustainable production system in agriculture | 5 | 9.0 |
AIGA Type | Area for application | Risks on the forest | Risk Mitigation measures |
Agriculture (more than 75% depend on it) | |||
1. Vegetables production (Mchicha, Matembele, Majani ya Kunde, Redfinger, spinach, tomatoes, etc) | Kisarawe: | If proper land use plan is not properly enforced there is a danger of encroaching the forest land. There are possible use of chemicals which if not properly guided can lead to environmental disaster | Land use plan must be clearly presented and proper management plan should be in place. · Extension officers should be in place to guide the farmers on the proper use of different inputs |
It was oberved that if a household could grow these fruits, average income per household per season is Tshs 400,000 | Maguruwe:- There is river Mzinga which could provide water for irrigation. There is water catchment | ||
Umatumbini area:- There is water catchment. However, there is a big problem of infrastructure | |||
Ilala: | |||
Nzasa:- There are two factors to make vegetables more potential: first is the availability of market due to location and good infrastructure; and second factor water catchment because the area is too close to the forest reserve | · The use of pesticides and fertilizers could be harmful to the environment and the downstream users | Extension officer should in place to guide the farmers | |
Kitunda:- Water from River Mzinga could provide water irrigation. It was observed that majority of farmers are using water from river Mzinga for irrigation. The observation was consistent with the study conducted by Ngana et al (2010) titled Kizinga-Catchment Management Strategy which found that 66% of farmers were using irrigation | Farming should be done in the river bank. A clear boundary should be set for farmers to follow. Also should allow the water to continue following in the river system | Same as above | |
Chanika:- Location and good infrastructure provide good market. Soil quality and water can provide a better environment for vegetable production | |||
2. Fruits production (passion, water melon, pineapples, sugarcane, bananas, cucumber, mangoes, oranges) | For passions and pineapples can be grown almost in all areas in the two districts. However, for greater impact in income generation, Kisarawe is better situated because there are large areas for farming compared to Ilala. | ||
Other fruits can be grown in areas where the is possibility of getting adequate water | |||
Mangoes and oranges have greater potentiality in Kisarawe district | |||
3. Crops (cassava, cashewnuts, sweet potatoes, sesame, | All these crops can be grown in kisarawe District because it is more rural. The justification here is availability of land. | ||
4. Tree Nursery Development | Greater potential in Ilala than in Kisarawe because of the level of urbanization | ||
5. Fish Farming | Kisarawe: Here the space is adequate and the community can harvest rain to create fish ponds | ||
Livestock: | |||
1. Poultry | Kisarawe: | ||
Kisarawe village availability of market | |||
Ilala | |||
Chanika its potential to sell the poultry produces | |||
2. Goat keeping | Can be done in Kisarawe | ||
Beekeeping (this also can provide avenues for beehives business) | In both district Ilala and Kisarawe because the beekeeping is going to be done in the forest reserves | This can help protect the forest. Guidance should be provided especially during the harvest. Fire harvest should be avoided | Extension officers should be in place |
Eco-tourism and its related businesses | Both Ilala and Kisarawe, but the centre could be put in Kisarawe | ||
1. Sculputure | |||
2. Batik | |||
3. Baskets | |||
4. Mikeka/Carpets | |||
Business establishment | |||
1. Retail shops | |||
2. Guest houses | |||
3. Restaurant/Pubs | |||
4. Tailoring | |||
5. Artworks | |||
6. Masonry | |||
7. Mama Ntilie/Lishe | |||
8. Garage operations |